-- Last revised 3/13/08 --
Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions
The Commission studied the following evidence issues:
- Whether California should create an exception to the hearsay rule for a present sense impression, similar to Federal Rule of Evidence 803(1).
- Whether California should revise its approach to forfeiture by wrongdoing as an exception to the hearsay rule. A related issue is whether the definition of an "unavailable" witness should be amended to include, under certain circumstances, a witness who refuses to testify. The Commission also studied this related issue.
If you have questions or comments on this study, send an e-mail to Barbara Gaal at bgaal@clrc.ca.gov.
Related Material
- Final Recommendation
- Tentative Recommendation
- Commission Decisions (Meeting Minutes)
- Staff Memoranda
- Subscribe to Receive Notice of New Materials
Final Recommendation
- Recommendation -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Present Sense Impression (Pre-print)
(February 2008)
- Recommendation -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (Pre-print)
(February 2008)
Top | CLRC Homepage
Tentative Recommendations and Other Requests for Comment
- Tentative Rec. -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Present Sense Impressions (October 2007) -- Comments Due: 12/3/2007
- Tentative Rec. -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Forfeiture By Wrongdoing (October 2007) -- Comments Due: 12/3/2007
Top | Home
Meeting Minutes
- February 14, 2008 Meeting in Sacramento
- January 17, 2008 Meeting in Sacramento
- December 13-14, 2007 Meeting in Burbank
- October 26, 2007 Meeting in Burbank
- August 24, 2007 Meeting in Burbank
Top | Home
Staff Memoranda
- Memo 2008-7 -- Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (Draft Recommendation) (2/11/2008)
- Memo 2008-6, Supp. 1 -- Present Sense Impressions (Draft Recommendation) (2/11/2008)
- Memo 2008-6 -- Present Sense Impressions (Draft Recommendation) (2/6/2008)
- Memo 2008-2 -- Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (Comments on Tentative Recommendation) (01/15/2008)
- Memo 2008-1 -- Present Sense Impressions (Comments on Tentative Recommendation) (01/14/2008)
- Memo 2007-54, Supp. 1 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (Initiative Measures in Preparation) (12/13/2007)
- Memo 2007-54 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (Comments on Tentative Recommendation) (12/11/2007)
- Memo 2007-53 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Present Sense Impressions (Comments on Tentative Recommendation) (12/10/2007)
- Memo 2007-41, Supp. 3 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (Comments of Prof. Flanagan and Prof. Méndez) (10/26/2007)
- Memo 2007-40, Supp. 1 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Present Sense Impressions (10/24/2007)
- Memo 2007-41, Supp. 2 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (Draft of Tentative Recommendation) (10/23/2007)
- Memo 2007-40 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Present Sense Impressions (10/18/2007)
- Memo 2007-41, Supp. 1 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (Comments of Prof. Méndez and Prof. Fisher) (10/16/2007)
- Memo 2007-41 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Forfeiture by Wrongdoing (10/10/2007)
- Memo 2007-28 -- Miscellaneous Hearsay Exceptions: Legislative Assignment (8/21/2007)
Top | Home
Subscribe
If you would like to receive email notification when new materials relating to this study are added to the website, please subscribe by entering your email address and clicking the "submit" button.Every message sent to you under this subscription will include instructions on how to unsubscribe.
Your email address will not be shared with any other person or group.
