-- Last revised 8/6/24 --
Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case - Study J-1452
At the Legislature's direction, the Law Revision Commission
has been reviewing the codes and recommending reforms to delete or update material
made obsolete by trial court restructuring. Much work on this topic has been completed
and enacted into law. For a number of reasons, some work remains to be done. For details,
see Statutes Made Obsolete by Trial Court Restructuring.
This study focuses on jurisdiction of a writ petition that
relates to a small claims case. After extensive study, the Commission approved a
final recommendation. The
Commission's proposal has been enacted. See
AB 1529 (Dickinson), 2012 Cal. Stat. ch. 470, §§ 2, 3.
Related Material
- Legislation
- Final Recommendation
- Tentative Recommendation
- Commission Decisions (Meeting Minutes)
- Staff Memoranda
Legislation
-
2012: Assembly Bill 1529 (Dickinson) [Trial Court Restructuring Omnibus Bill]
[Enacted as 2012 Cal. Stat. ch. 470]
Top | CLRC Homepage
Final Recommendation
- Recommendation --
Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (August 2011)
Top | CLRC Homepage
Tentative Recommendations and Other Requests for Comment
- Tentative Rec. --
Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (October 2010)
- Tentative Rec. --
Statutes Made Obsolete by Trial Court Restructuring: Part 3 (August 2006), pp. 9-13 & 34-39
Top | CLRC Homepage
Meeting Minutes
- August 11, 2011 Meeting in Sacramento
- June 9, 2011 Meeting in Sacramento
- April 14, 2011 Meeting in Sacramento
- October 14, 2010 Meeting in Sacramento
- April 15, 2010 Meeting in Sacramento
- December 17, 2009 Meeting in Los Angeles
- August 28, 2009 Meeting in Sacramento, pp. 6-7
- April 23, 2009 Meeting in Sacramento, pp. 4-7
- December 8, 2006 Meeting in Burbank, p. 13
- August 18, 2006 Meeting in Burbank, p. 5
- June 22-23, 2006 Meeting in Sacramento, pp. 19-25
Top | CLRC Homepage
Staff Memoranda
- Memo 2011-23, Supp. 2 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (Further Input) (08/08/2011)
- Memo 2011-23, Supp. 1 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (06/09/2011)
- Memo 2011-23 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (Draft Recommendation) (05/06/2011)
- Memo 2011-10, Supp. 1 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (04/14/2011)
- Memo 2011-10 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (Comments on Tentative Recommendation) (02/08/2011)
- Memo 2010-44 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiiction in a Small Claims Case (Draft of Tentative Recommendation) (10/11/2010)
- Memo 2010-25 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (Discussion of Issues) (06/02/2010)
- Memo 2010-18 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (Discussion of Issues) (04/12/2010)
- Memo 2009-51 -- Trial Court Restructuring: Writ Jurisdiction in a Small Claims Case (Progress Update) (12/14/2009)
- Memo 2009-34, Supp. 2 -- Statutes Made Obsolete by Trial Court Restructuring: Part 5 (Staff Draft Tentative Recommendation) (08/24/2009), pp.2-4 & EX 6
- Memo 2009-34 -- Statutes Made Obsolete by Trial Court Restructuring: Part 5 (Staff Draft Tentative Recommendation) (07/20/2009) attachment pp. 4-6 & 19-20
- Memo 2009-20 -- Statutes Made Obsolete by Trial Court Restructuring: Part 5 (Discussion of Issues) (04/07/2009), pp. 6-14
- Memo 2006-44 -- Statutes Made Obsolete By Trial Court Restructuring: Part 3 (Comments on Tentative Recommendation) (11/21/2006), pp. 7-9 & EX 1-3, 5
- Memo 2006-31 -- Statutes Made Obsolete by Trial Court Restructuring: Part 3 (Draft of Tentative Recommendation) (7/25/2006), attachment pp. 9-13 & 34-39
- Memo 2006-21, Supp. 1 -- Statutes Made Obsolete By Trial Court Restructuring: Appellate and Writ Jurisdiction in a Civil Case (6/16/2006), pp. 9-12 & EX 1-6
- Memo 2006-21 -- Statutes Made Obsolete By Trial Court Restructuring: Appellate and Writ Jurisdiction in a Civil Case (5/18/2006), pp. 27-36