-- Last revised 11/19/09 --

Review of California Evidence Code - Study K-200

    The Commission has commenced a review of the Evidence Code. The Commission has done work on hearsay issues and on issues relating to the role of judge and jury, but has not issued a tentative recommendation on either subject. The project is currently on hold.
    The Commission is assisted by Professor Miguel Méndez of U.C. Davis Law School. Prof. Méndez has prepared a background study for the Commission, consisting of nine parts:

(1) Hearsay and Its Exceptions (see 37 U.S.F. L. Rev. 351 (2003))

(2) Expert Testimony and the Opinion Rule (see 37 U.S.F. L. Rev. 411 (2003))

(3) The Role of Judge and Jury (see 37 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1003 (2003))

(4) Presumptions and Burden of Proof (see 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 139 (2003))

(5) Witnesses (see 39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 455 (2003))

(6) Authentication and the Best and Secondary Evidence Rules (see 41 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1 (2006))

(7) Relevance: Definition and Limitations (see 42 U.S.F. L. Rev. 329 (2007))

(8) Judicial Notice (see 44 U.S.F. L. Rev. 141 (2009))

(9) General Provisions (see 44 U.S.F. L. Rev. 891 (2010))

    If you have questions or comments on the role of judge and jury, send email to Brian Hebert at bhebert@clrc.ca.gov. If you have questions or comments on any other aspect of this study, including the hearsay issues, send email to Barbara Gaal at bgaal@clrc.ca.gov.

Related Material

• Commission Decisions (Meeting Minutes)
• Staff Memoranda
• Background Study
• Subscribe to Receive Notice of New Materials

---

Meeting Minutes

• March 17-18, 2005 Meeting in Sacramento
• September 17, 2004 Meeting in Oakland
• June 10, 2004 Meeting in Sacramento
• November 21, 2003 Meeting in Burbank
• September 18-19, 2003 Meeting in Burbank
• March 7, 2003 Meeting in Sacramento
• September 13, 2002 Meeting in San Francisco

Top | Home

---

Staff Memoranda

• Memo 2005-6 -- Conforming the Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence: More Hearsay Issues (1/6/2005)

• Memo 2004-55 -- Conforming Evidence Code To Federal Rules: Role of Judge and Jury (11/8/2004)

• Memo 2004-44 -- Conforming Evidence Code To Federal Rules: Role of Judge and Jury (9/3/2004)

• Memo 2004-45 -- Conforming the Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence: Hearsay Issues (8/31/2004)

• Memo 2004-28 -- Conforming the Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence: Hearsay Issues (6/7/2004)

• Memo 2004-18, Supp. 1 -- Conforming the Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence: Additional Hearsay Issues (6/7/2004)

• Memo 2004-19 -- Conforming Evidence Code to Federal Rules: Role of Judge and Jury (5/28/04)

• Memo 2004-18 -- Conforming the Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence: Additional Hearsay Issues (3/29/2004)

• Memo 2003-39, Supp. 1 -- Conforming the Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence: Comments of Professor Méndez (11/18/2003)

• Memo 2003-39 -- Conforming the Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence: Additional Hearsay Issues (10/30/2003)

• Memo 2003-26, Supp. 1 -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Input of State Bar Trusts and Estates Section on Evidence Code Section 1260 (9/15/2003)

• Memo 2003-26 -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Hearsay Issues (8/4/2003)

• Memo 2003-7, Supp. 1 -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Hearsay Issues (2/28/2003)

• Memo 2003-7 -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Hearsay Issues (2/25/2003)

• Memo 2002-56, Supp. 1 -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Comments of Prof. Mendez Regarding Dying Declarations (11/4/2002)

• Memo 2002-56 -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Hearsay Issues (10/29/2002)

• Memo 2002-41, Supp. 1 -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Comments of Professor Slomanson (9/12/2002)

• Memo 2002-41 -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Introduction of Study and Definition of Hearsay (8/29/2002)

Top | Home

---

Background Study

• Background Study -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Part I. Hearsay and Its Exceptions; Prof. Miguel A. Méndez (May 2002, Corrected Oct. 2003)

• Background Study -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Part I. Hearsay and Its Exceptions; Prof. Miguel A. Méndez (May 2002)

• Background Study -- Comparison of Evidence Code with Federal Rules: Part II. Expert Testimony and the Opinion Rule; Prof. Miguel A. Méndez (May 2002)

Top | CLRC Homepage

---

Subscribe

If you would like to receive email notification when new materials relating to this study are added to the website, please complete the form below.

If you were already signed up to one of our mailing lists, you will receive an immediate error message. Click the link within that message to "update your profile." You will then be sent an email that you can use to choose which notice lists you wish to be on.

After you have submitted your address, you will receive an email asking you to confirm. This prevents someone else from signing you up.

Every message sent to you under this subscription will include instructions on how to unsubscribe.

Your email address will not be shared with any other person or group.